Kamalamma P v. the Tahasildar
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to pursue other available remedies; the High Court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
What did the court decide?
Liberty to avail other remedies; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM
TUESDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 6TH CHAITHRA, 1946 WP(C) NO. 26823 OF 2023
PETITIONER:
KAMALAMMA P AGED 71 YEARS W/O. VIJAYARAJAN RESIDING AT PANTHAPLAVILA THEKKATHIL SASTHAMCOTTA VILLAGE KOLLAM, PIN - 690521 BY ADVS. S.SREEKUMAR (KOLLAM) K.VIJAYAN NAMITHA RAJESH SHEENAMOL VARGHESE
RESPONDENTS:
- 1 THE TAHASILDAR TALUK OFFICE KUNNATHOOR TALUK SASTHAMCOTTA VILLAGE KOLLAM, PIN - 690521
- 2 THE VILLAGE OFFICER SASTHAMCOTTA VILLAGE KOLLAM, PIN - 690521
OTHER PRESENT:
GP – SMT.DEEPA V
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
KAMALAMMA P
- respondent
THE TAHASILDAR TALUK OFFICE KUNNATHOOR TALUK
- respondent
THE VILLAGE OFFICER SASTHAMCOTTA VILLAGE
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court