Stephen v. the Arbitrator
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the writ petition, which challenged the non-passing of orders under Section 3G of the National Highways Act, holding that the matter was already disposed of by the respondent.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
FRIDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 27TH MAGHA, 1945
WP(C) NO. 26456 OF 2014
PETITIONER:
STEPHEN,
AGED 63 YEARS,
S/O. VARAPPAN, KOOLIYATH HOUSE, METHALA VILLAGE,
KOTTAPPURAM P.O., KODUNGALLUR.
BY ADV SRI.SUNNY MATHEW
RESPONDENT:
THE ARBITRATOR,
(DISTRICT COLLECTOR), THRISSUR-680 001.
SRI.VENUGOPAL V, GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
16.02.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition is maintainable given that the application under Section 3G was already disposed of.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
STEPHEN
- respondent
THE ARBITRATOR
Coram
GOPINATH P
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court