N.M.Manoj v. Forest Range Officer
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE…
What did the court decide?
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
MONDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 7TH PHALGUNA, 1945
WP(C) NO. 1699 OF 2019
PETITIONER/S:
N.M.MANOJ, AGED 46 YEARS
S/O. MOHANAN, NELLIPARAMBIL HOUSE,
KURUMBILAVU, THRISSUR DISTRICT-680 564
BY ADV S.SUJIN
RESPONDENT/S:
1 FOREST RANGE OFFICER WADAKKANCHERY FOREST RANGE, CHITTANDA, THRISSUR-680 5852 DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICERKALYAN NAGAR, AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR-680 003
3 CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS, CENTRAL CIRCLE, THRISSUR-PALAKKAD ROAD, PRIYADARSINI NAGAR, PARAVATTANI, THRISSUR-680 0054STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001
BY ADV SRI.SANDESH RAJA.K., SPL. G.P. (FOREST)
SRI, BINOY DAVIS, GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
26.02.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 1699 OF 2019 2
JUDGMENT
When this matter is taken up for consideration today, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition, reserving liberty of the petitioner to challenge any orders passed, after filing of the writ petition.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, reserving the liberty as aforesaid.
Sd/-
GOPINATH P.
JUDGE
ajt
N.M.MANOJ
STATE OF KERALA
GOPINATH P.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court