Dismissed
Vinod E.V. v. State of Kerala
Kerala HCWP(C)/16141/2016
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitioner sought quashing of an order. The court held that since the matter had been disposed of by the respondents via a representation, the writ petition was infructuous and was closed.
What did the court decide?
Writ Petition closed as infructuous on the ground that the matter had been disposed of by the respondents.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
¶2
PRESENT
¶3
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE EASWARAN S.
¶4
FRIDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF JULY 2024 / 4TH SRAVANA, 1946
¶5
WP(C) NO. 16141 OF 2016
¶6
PETITIONER:
¶7
VINOD E.V.
¶8
AGED 45 YEARS, S/O.VELAYUDHAN,
URETHARA HOUSE, ASOKAPURAM PO,
KEEZHMADU PANCHAYATH, ALUVA,
ERNAKULAM DISTRICT 683 112.
¶9
BY ADVS.
SRI.RAAJESH S.SUBRAHMANIAN
SRI.V.R.RAJESH
¶10
RESPONDENTS:
¶11
1 STATE OF KERALA SCHEDULED CASTES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHARUAM 695 001.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
VINOD E.V.
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA SCHEDULED CASTES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
- respondent
TAHSILDAR ALUVA
- respondent
SCHEDULED CASTES DEVELOPMENT OFFICER VAZHAKULAM
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court