Cyril v.Joseph v. Union of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition concerning Combined Defence Services Examination recruitment became infructuous; counsel for the petitioner conceded this at admission stage.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
MONDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 14TH PHALGUNA, 1945
WP(C) NO. 14368 OF 2020
PETITIONER/S:
CYRIL V.JOSEPH
AGED 23 YEARS
S/O.JOSEPH V.CHERIAN, VELLIYAPPILLIL HOUSE,
THOTTUMUKKOM P.O., KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, KERALA.
BY ADV RAJU K.MATHEWS
RESPONDENT/S:
1 UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110 001.
2 UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, REPRESNETED BY ITS SECRETARY, DHOLPUR HOUSE, SAHAJAHAN ROAD, NEW DELHI-110 069.
3 ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF RECRUITING (RTG-6), AG'S BRANCH, IHQ OF MINISTRY OF DEFENCE (ARMY), WEST BLOCK-III, R.K.PURAM, NEW DELHI-110 066.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Cyril V. Joseph
- respondent
Union of India represented by its Secretary to Government, Ministry of Defence
- respondent
Union Public Service Commission
- respondent
Additional Director General of Recruiting (RTG-6)
- respondent
The Call Up Officer, Selection Centre-East
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court