Anil Thomas v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
Hon'ble Court observed that the present writ petition has become infructuous and accordingly dismissed the petition as infructuous.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.
WEDNESDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 16TH PHALGUNA, 1945
WP(C) NO. 13141 OF 2022
PETITIONER:
ANIL THOMAS, AGED 28 YEARS SON OF THOMAS C., NARIYADUKKAM KADAVU, MUNNAD, KASARAGOD, KERALA-671541.
BY ADV V.JOHN MANI
RESPONDENTS:
- 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL EDUCATION, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.
- 2 THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL EDUCATION, JAGATHI, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695014.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition is infructuous and if so, how shall it be disposed of.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
ANIL THOMAS
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
- respondent
DIRECTOR OF GENERAL EDUCATION
- respondent
COMMISSIONER, OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF GOVERNMENT EXAMINATIONS
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court