Writ petition by petitioners against ECHS authorities; counsel stated they were not interested in pursuing the matter further. The High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous without deciding any substantive issue.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE EASWARAN S.
TUESDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 20TH CHAITHRA, 1946
WP(C) NO. 10144 OF 2018
PETITIONERS:
1 PROMODKUMAR AGED 49 YEARS S/O.PADMANABAN NAIR, AGED 49 YEARS, PADMASREE HOUSE, KOTTAVAYIL, PUTHURVAYIL P.O., KALPETTA, WAYANAD DISTRICT.
BY ADV SMT.ANITHA MENON
RESPONDENTS:
BY ADVS. SRI.SUVIN R.MENON, CGC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09.04.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 10144 OF 2018
2
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that they are not interested to pursue the matter further.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-EASWARAN.S JUDGE
lsn
Promodkumar
Shijina P.S.
The Director (Complaint & Litigation), Central Organization ECHS
Regional Director, ECHS Regional Centre Naval Bose Kochi
Officer in Charge, ECHS Polyclinic Kalpetta
Easwaran S.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
