Jamaludheen, v. Siyad E.
Case brief
What is this about?
Three civil transfer petitions relating to a matrimonial dispute were not pressed by counsel and were dismissed as not pressed. The order decides nothing of general application.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH
WEDNESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE 2024 / 15TH JYAISHTA, 1946 TR.P(C) NO. 190 OF 2020
PETITIONERS:
1 RINCY R, AGED 29 YEARS W/O SIYAD , PONGATHIL KIZHAKKETHIL HOUSE, ATHIKKATTUKULANGARA P.O.NOORANAD, PALAMEL VILLAGE, PIN-690 504.
2 SAHRA S.R, AGED 3 YEARS D/O SIYAD, PONGATHIL KIZHAKKETHIL HOUSE, ATHIKKATTUKULANGARA P.O.NOORANAD, PALAMEL VILLAGE, PIN-690 504, ( MINOR REPRESENTED BY 1ST PETITIONER )
BY ADVS. RASHEED C.NOORANAD SRI.G.GOPAKUMAR (CHERTHALA) SMT.ANITHA M.N. (EKM)
RESPONDENT:
SIYAD E AGED 32 YEARS S/O IBRAHIM, KUZHIYIL VEEDU, PRA 91, KANIYAPURAM P.O.PALLIPURAM VILLAGE, TRIVANDRUM, PIN-695 301.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Rincy R
- petitioner
Sahra S.R
- petitioner
Jamaludheen
- petitioner
Rafiyath K
- respondent
Siyad E
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court