Shyni v. Jijo
Case brief
What is this about?
Wife and children sought transfer of a gold ornaments return petition from Family Court, Kunnamkulam to Family Court, Thrissur, since three other matters between the parties were pending there. The court held the four connected matters should be tried by the same court and allowed the transfer.
What did the court decide?
O.P.No.1622/2023 withdrawn from Family Court, Kunnamkulam and transferred to Family Court, Thrissur for trial and disposal.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH
WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 14TH CHAITHRA, 1946
TR.P(C) NO. 48 OF 2024
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN OP NO.1622 OF 2023 OF FAMILY COURT, KUNNAMKULAM
PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS:
1 SHYNI AGED 43 YEARS W/O JIJO,THEKKEKKARA HOUSE, KOLAZHI VILLAGE, TIRUR, THRISSUR, PIN - 680010
2 ALFRINO AGED 19 YEARS, S/O JIJO, THEKKEKKARA HOUSE, KOLAZHI VILLAGE, TIRUR, THRISSUR, PIN - 680010
3 ANEETTA AGED 18 YEAR,D/O JIJO, THEKKEKKARA HOUSE, KOLAZHI VILLAGE, TIRUR, THRISSUR, PIN - 680010 BY ADVS. K.R.ARUN KRISHNAN DEEPA K.RADHAKRISHNAN JISSMON A KURIAKOSE SANAL C.S SIDHARTHAN M.T.
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT:
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Should O.P.No.1622/2022 pending before Family Court, Kunnamkulam be transferred to Family Court, Thrissur where other connected cases between the parties are pending?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Shyni
- petitioner
Alfrino
- petitioner
Aneetta
- respondent
Jijo
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court