Thomas v. D v Prasanth
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court in Kerala allowed the petitioner to file transfer petitions seeking to transfer seven suits instituted by the respondent for recovery of damages from various Munsiff Courts in Ernakulam to the Munsiff Court at Sulthan Bathery, Wayanad based on transaction location and residence.
What did the court decide?
O.S.Nos.389/2023, 395/2023, 620/2023, 52/2023, 1228/2023, 320/2023 and 552/2023 withdrawn and transferred to Sulthan Bathery for trial and disposal.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH THURSDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF JUNE 2024 / 16TH JYAISHTA, 1946 TR.P(C) NO. 37 OF 2024
OS NO.389 OF 2023 OF MUNSIFF COURT,MUVATTUPUZHA PETITIONER/DEFENDANT:
THOMAS V D AGED 53 YEARS S/O DEVASIA, KOTTARATHIL HOUSE, ARMAD,KUPPADI P.O,KUPPADI, WAYANAD, PIN - 673592
BY ADVS.ELDHO.N.MONCY P.PARVATHY
RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF:
PRASANTH V S S/O SASI, VARAKIL HOUSE, MUNDANMUDY P.O, VANNAPPURAM, VANNAPURAM VILLAGE, THODUPUZHA TALUK, THODUPUZHA IDUKKI DISTRICT, PIN – 685018
SRI. SHIJU VARGHESE
THIS TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06.06.2024, ALONG WITH Tr.P(C).38/2024 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the suits for recovery of damages filed in various Ernakulam district courts should be transferred to the Munsiff's Court at Sulthan Bathery, Wayanad.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
THOMAS V D
- respondent
PRASANTH V S S
Coram
KAUSER EDAPPAGATH
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court