Sathyanessan v. Babu
Case brief
What is this about?
Regular second appeal against concurrent decrees in a title suit dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellant was absent and unrepresented; pending interlocutory applications were dismissed and interlocutory orders vacated.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN
WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF JANUARY 2024 / 4TH MAGHA, 1945
RSA NO. 688 OF 2022
AGAINST THE DECREE AND JUDGMENT IN AS 27/2014 OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT -VII, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
AGAINST THE DECREE AND JUDGMENT IN OS 8/1997 OF SUB COURT, NEDUMANGAD APPELLANT/RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT:
SATHYANESSAN AGED 57 YEARS S/O DEVADASAN NAIR, SATHYA BHAVAN, VETTAVILA PUNALAL MURI, PERUMKULAM VILLAGE, NEDUMANGAD TALUK.
BY ADVS. ABRAHAM MATHEW (VETTOOR) ANIL ABEY JOSE
RESPONDENT/APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF:
BABU, S/O LASAR NADAR, POTTAMANAPAZHINJI PUTHEN VEEDU, KAZHUVOOR DESOM, KANHIRAMKULAM VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sathyanessan
- respondent
Babu
Coram
A. Badharudeen
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court