Regular second appeal against concurrent judgments in a property suit; the application to condone a 1908-day delay in filing was dismissed, so the appeal itself was dismissed as time barred.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN
MONDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF JANUARY 2024 / 25TH POUSHA, 1945
RSA NO. 687 OF 2023
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT OS 348/2012 OF MUNSIFF COURT,KAYAMKULAM AND IN AS 70/2014 OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT-II, MAVELIKKARA
APPELLANTS/APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF:
KRISHNA KUMARI @ KUSUMAM AGED 53 YEARS PUTHENTHARA THEKKATHIL, PULLIKKANAKKU MURI, KRISHNAPURAM VILLAGE, KRISHNAPURAM P.O., ALLEPPEY DISTRICT, PIN - 690533
BY ADVS. BABU CHERUKARA V.R.ARUN ANZAR BASHEER NIKHIL KARETH
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT:
RAJAN AGED 58 YEARS SREYAS VEEDU, PULLIKKANAKKU MURI, KRISHNAPURAM VILLAGE, KRISHNAPURAM P.O., ALLEPPEY DISTRICT, PIN - 690533
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15.01.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
RSA NO. 687 OF 2023
2
J U D G M E N T
Since C.M.Appl. No.1/2023 filed to condone the delay of
1908 days in filing this Second Appeal has been dismissed, this
Second Appeal also is dismissed being time barred.
sd/-
A. BADHARUDEEN
JUDGE
rp
Krishna Kumari @ Kusumam
Rajan
A. Badharudeen
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
