Devarajan v. Vilasini
Case brief
What is this about?
Regular second appeal concerning property dispute was dismissed as infructuous after counsel for the appellant submitted the appeal had become infructuous. No substantive adjudication on merits.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN
TUESDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF JANUARY 2024 / 19TH POUSHA, 1945
RSA NO. 668 OF 2014
JUDGMENT AND DECREE OF THE 2ND ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, THODUPUZHA IN AS.NO.84/2012 DATED 18.02.2014 AND AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE OF THE MUNSIFF'S COURT, THODUPUZHA DATED 24.09.2012 IN O.S NO.110/2011
APPELLANT/APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF:
DEVARAJAN AGED 54 YEARS S/O.BHASKARAN, KUNDOTHARA HOUSE, EDAVANAKKAD KARA, EDAVANAKKAD P.O., KOCHI TALUK.
BY ADVS. SRI.K.K.CHANDRAN PILLAI (SR.) SMT.S.AMBILY SRI.ARUN ANTONY SRI.M.K.HARIPRIYESH SMT.K.V.SHENU
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT:
VILASINI
Parties & counsel
- appellant
DEVARAJAN
- respondent
VILASINI
Coram
A. BADHARUDEEN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court