Kunjumon v. Philomina
Case brief
What is this about?
Regular second appeal dismissed as counsel for the appellant stated he had no instructions from the client.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM
TUESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF JULY 2024 / 1ST SRAVANA, 1946
RSA NO. 380 OF 2008
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 24.09.2007 IN AS NO.78 OF 2004 OF ADDITIONAL SUB
COURT, IRINJALAKUDA
ARISING OUT OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 29.03.2004 IN OS NO.1652 OF 2000 OF ADDITIONAL
MUNSIFF COURT ,IRINJALAKUDA
APPELLANT/APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF:
KUNJUMON
S/O.PONTHELAVELAPPIL ADIMAKUNJI,KALLUR VILLAGE, DESOM, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Kunjumon
- respondent
Philomina John
- respondent
Lonappan, S/o. Kavalakkadan Vareed
- respondent
Babu
- respondent
Kochappan
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court