Usha S.P. v. Abdul Samad
Case brief
What is this about?
The Second Appellate Court disposed of three regular second appeals (RSA 334/2015, 489/2015, 496/2015) by recording a compromise agreement between the parties, with one party represented by a Power of Attorney evident from annexures.
What did the court decide?
The appeals were disposed of based on the terms of the compromise recorded between the parties.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.PRATHEEP KUMAR
THURSDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 15TH CHAITHRA, 1946
RSA NO. 334 OF 2015
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 11.02.2015 IN AS NO.10 OF 2014 OF SUBORDINATE JUDGE'S COURT VATAKARA ARISING OUT OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 31.01.2014 IN OS NO.135 OF 2008 OF MUNSIFF COURT, VATAKARA APPELLANT/APPELLANT IN AS & RESPONDENT IN CO/PLAINTIFF IN OS:
USHA S.P.
AGED 46 YEARS, W/O. MAHESH M.G, KUNNUMMAL HOUSE, PUTHUPPANAM AMSOM DESOM VATAKARA TALUK,KOZHIKODE DISTRICT,KERALA.
BY ADVS. SRI.B.KRISHNAN SRI.R.PARTHASARATHY SMT.SEEMA
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT IN AS & CROSS OBJECTORS IN
CO/DEFENDANTS IN OS:
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
USHA S.P.
- respondent
MURIKKOLI FAROOQ
- respondent
ABDUL SAMAD
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court