Valsala v. V.G Sasikumar
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal against concurrent decrees declaring the plaintiff's title over item No.2 property and fixing the boundary with the defendants' property. The High Court found no substantial question of law was raised and dismissed the appeal without admission.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN
MONDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY 2024 / 2ND MAGHA, 1945
RSA NO. 225 OF 2023
AGAINST THE DECREE AND JUDGMENT DATED 31.10.2019 IN OS
636/2009 OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF COURT, ALAPPUZHA
DECREE AND JUDGMENT DATED 29.10.2022 IN AS 26/2021 OF SUB
COURT, ALAPPUZHA
APPELLANT/1ST APPELLANT/1ST DEFENDANT:
VALSALA AGED 71 YEARS W/O. LATE BALAN, VALSALA BHAVAN, ARYAD SOUTH VILLAGE, THATHAMPALLY P.O, ALAPPUZHA, PIN - 688013 BY ADV DOMSON J.VATTAKUZHY
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether any substantial question of law arose warranting admission of the second appeal against concurrent decrees declaring title and fixing a boundary.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Valsala
- respondent
V.G Sasikumar
- respondent
Santhosh Kumar
- respondent
Sajikumar
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court