Disposed
Pavithran v. Phalgunan
Kerala HCRSA/18/2015
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
In a regular second appeal arising from a suit between the parties, both sides reported a settlement. The appellant sought permission to withdraw the suit and the appeal in view of the settlement, which the respondents did not oppose.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
¶2
PRESENT
¶3
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN
¶4
MONDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 28TH PHALGUNA, 1945
¶5
RSA NO. 18 OF 2015
¶6
AGAINST THE DECREE AND JUDGMENT DATED 03.09.2014 IN AS NO.46 OF 2009
OF SUB COURT, CHERTHALA ARISING OUT OF THE DECREE AND JUDGMENT DATED
28.02.2009 IN OS NO.145 OF 2006 OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF COURT, CHERTHALA
¶7
APPELLANT/APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF:
¶8
1PAVITHRAN
S/O.GOVINDAN, SYAMALALAYAM, FROM KANNAMKERRY PADINJARE
NIKARTHIL, ERAMALLOOR MURI, EZHUPUNNA VILLAGE,
PIN - 688 537.
¶9
2ADDL.SAM PAVITHRAN,
S/O.V.G.PAVITHRAN,AGED 38
YEARS,DRIVER,SNEHAVEEDU,ERAMALLOOR P.O., EZHUPUNNA
VILLAGE, CHERTHALA TALUK,PIN - 688 537. (ADDL.APPELLANT 2
IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 24.11.2022 IN IA.3/2019.)
BY ADVS.
¶10
SRI.M.P.RAMNATH
SRI.BEPIN PAUL
SRI.P.RAJESH KOTTAKKAL
SRI.SHALU VARGHESE
SMT.S.SANDHYA
SMT.UMA R.KAMATH
SEI.M.VARGHESE VARGHESE
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Pavithran
- appellant
Sam Pavithran
- respondent
Phalgunan
- respondent
Sudhakaran
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court