Disposed
P.R.Narayanan v. Santhamma
Kerala HCRSA/1000/2018
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Regular second appeal arising from a property suit was settled in mediation. The court accepted the memorandum of settlement and disposed of the appeal in terms of it, making the settlement part of the decree.
What did the court decide?
Appeal disposed of as per terms of memorandum of settlement, which forms part of the decree.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
¶2
PRESENT
¶3
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.PRATHEEP KUMAR
¶4
FRIDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 23RD CHAITHRA, 1946
¶5
RSA NO. 1000 OF 2018
¶6
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE DATED 07.08.2018 IN AS NO.164 OF
2013 OF III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, KOTTAYAM ARISING OUT OF THE
JUDGMENT & DECREE DATED 21.06.2013 IN OS NO.252 OF 2010 OF MUNSIFF
COURT, ETTUMANOOR
¶7
APPELLANT/APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF:
¶8
P.R.NARAYANAN
AGED 64 YEARS
S/O RAMAN, PUTHENPURAYIL HOUSE, ARPOOKKARA WEST P.O,
ARPOOKKARA KARA, ARPOOKKARA VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.
¶9
LIJI.J.VADAKEDOM
SMT.REXY ELIZABETH THOMAS
SRI.RAJEEV JYOTHISH GEORGE
¶10
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS:
¶11
1 SANTHAMMA
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
P.R.NARAYANAN
- respondent
SANTHAMMA
- respondent
RAVEENDRAN
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court