Arshad H. v. Sharmila S.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought to withdraw this revision petition in a family court matter, citing an out-of-court settlement. The High Court dismissed the revision petition as withdrawn.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
MONDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF JULY 2024 / 24TH ASHADHA, 1946
RPFC NO. 80 OF 2022
AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 20.11.2019 IN MC NO.133 OF 2019 OF FAMILY
COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
PETITIONER/ RESPONDENT IN M.C :
ARSHAD H,
AGED 43 YEARS, S/O. HABEEB MOHAMMED, RESIDING AT THORIYIL VEEDU, PRESSMUKKU, EDAVA P. O., VARKALA, TRIVANDRUM, WORKING AS LOWER DIVISION CLERK, RMC (REVENUE MONITOR CELL), JALA BHAVAN, VELLAYAMBALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
BY ADV SIVAN MADATHIL
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Arshad H
- respondent
Sharmila S
- respondent
A. S. Dilsha
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court