Revision petition against a Family Court, Kottayam maintenance order was not pressed by the petitioner's counsel; the High Court dismissed it as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
TUESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 22ND PHALGUNA, 1945
RPFC NO. 224 OF 2023
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN MC NO.152 OF 2018 OF FAMILY COURT,
KOTTAYAM
REVISION PETITIONER/RESPONDENT:
ANUKRISHNA PARASURAMAN
AGED 32 YEARS
SON OF SRI. PARASURAMAN KONIKKARA HOUSE,
7TH STREET UMA NAGAR P.O., KOLAZHI,
THRISSUR TALUK THRISSUR DISTRICT, KERALA, PIN -680581,
REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER
V.K. ANIL, AGED 39 YEARS,
SON OF SRI. V.R.KRISHNANKUTTY, VADAKKEVETTIL HOUSE,
PALAPARAMBIL LANE, PUNKUNNAM P.O., THRISSUR TALUK,
THRISSUR DISTRICT, KERALA, PIN - 680002
BY ADVS.
LUKE J CHIRAYIL
JASNI JALAL
AMAL JOSE
RESPONDENT/PETITIONER:
AJITHA RAJU
AGED 30 YEARS
DAUGHTER OF SRI. RAJU,
KIDARATHIL HOUSE, AREEPARAMBU P.O,
MANARKADU VILLAGE KOTTAYAM DISTRICT,
KERALA, PIN - 686501
BY ADVS.
MARY P T
R.S.REJITHA(K/773/2007)
CAROLIN SINDHU VAZ(K/716/1998)
THIS REV.PETITION(FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 12.03.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
2
RPFC NO. 224 OF 2023
ORDER
When the matter is taken up for hearing the
learned counsel for the revision petitioners
fairly submitted that he is not pressing the
revision petition. Hence, the RPFC will stand
dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/-
P.SOMARAJAN
JUDGE
SPV
Anukrishna Parasuraman
Ajitha Raju
P.Somarajan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court