Review Petition held to be infructuous as no representation was filed; closed without prejudice to right to seek restoration.
Review Petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.
MONDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 21ST PHALGUNA, 1945
RP NO. 272 OF 1995
REVIEW PETITIONER:
PERINTHALMANNA MUNICIPALITY BY ADVS. SRI.B.GOPAKUMAR SMT.CHINCY GOPAKUMAR
RESPONDENT:
ASST.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, P.W.D.& OTHERS
OTHER PRESENT:
SMT.K.G.SAROJINI, GP
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11.03.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
RP NO. 272 OF 1995
..2..
MOHAMMED NIAS C. P. , J.
========================
R. P. No. 272 of 1995
========================= Dated this the 11th day of March, 2024
O R D E R
There is no representation for the petitioner. Obviously,
the matter would have become infructuous. The Review Petition is accordingly closed, without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to seek restoration in case the cause of
action, as alleged in the petition, still survives.
Sd/-
MOHAMMED NIAS C. P., JUDGE
LU
PERINTHALMANNA MUNICIPALITY
ASST.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, P.W.D.
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
