Review petition concerning a judgment on higher grade promotion described as a ratio promotion. The court corrected a factual error in the judgment and clarified that cancellation of ratio grade promotion was not challenged before the tribunal, leaving any remedy open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
&
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN
MONDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 12TH CHAITHRA, 1946
RP NO. 270 OF 2024
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 05.01.2024 IN OP(KAT) NO.136 OF 2020 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
REVIEW PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS:
BY ADVS.
K.P.CHANDRASEKHAR P.SANTHOSH KUMAR (PANAMPALLI NAGAR) LUIZ GODWIN D COUTH
V.ANANDA SHENOY
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:
SRI. K.A. ANAS GP
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01.04.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
R.P.No.270 of 2024
..2..
O R D E R
A. Muhamed Mustaque, J.
The review petitioner is the petitioner in the original petition. It is stated in the judgment that the petitioner was granted higher grade promotion but it was a ratio promotion. If there is any factual error in the judgment, that is corrected as above.
With above clarification and observations, we dispose of this review petition.
Sd/-
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE
Sd/-
SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN JUDGE
PR
R.Somasekhara Kurup
P.Sreedevi
The State of Kerala
The Secretary, Kerala Public Service Commission
The Accountant General (A & E) Kerala
A. Muhamed Mustaque
Shoba Annamma Eapen
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
