K.P.Sadhujan v. C.I. of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
The court closed a review petition as infructuous without representation from the petitioner, reserving the petitioner's right to seek restoration if the cause of action survives.
What did the court decide?
Review petition closed; right to seek restoration reserved.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.
MONDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 14TH PHALGUNA, 1945 RP NO. 265 OF 1995
REVIEW PETITIONER:
K.P.SADHUJAN
BY ADV. SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU (SR.) ALONG WITH ADV. SRI. ALEX M. THOMBRA, GEETHA JOB
RESPONDENT:
C.I. OF POLICE
ADV. SRI.T.A.UNNIKRISHNAN
SRI.PREMCHAND R.NAIR, SR.G.P.
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04.03.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.P.SADHUJAN
- respondent
C.I. OF POLICE
Coram
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court