A regular first appeal by a bank borrower against a suit decree was dismissed as not pressed after both parties submitted that the matter had been settled between them; the court waived the requirement of court fee on settlement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN
FRIDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 11TH PHALGUNA, 1945
RFA NO. 322 OF 2007
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN O.S.NO.43 OF 2005 OF PRINCIPAL SUB COURT, COCHIN
APPELLANT/DEFENDANT:
V.B.VINU RAJ, S/O.BHASKARAN, RAJ NIVAS, H.NO.X/1462, SOUTH THAMARAPARAMBU, KOCHI-682001.
BY ADVS. Karthik SA C.R.SANISH(K/219/2009)
RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF:
THE CATHOLIC SYRIAN BANK LTD. HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT TRICHUR AND BRANCH AT KOCHI-1, REP. BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER.
BY ADVS. SRI.MADHU RADHAKRISHNAN SRI.P.RADHAKRISHNAN 1 (EXPIRED)
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR HEARING ON 01.03.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Sathish Ninan, J.
=====================
R.F.A (Indigent).No.322 of 2007 =================================== Dated this the 1st day of March, 2024
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel on either sides submit
that the matter has been settled between the
parties and that the appeal is not pressed.
Accordingly, the RFA is dismissed as not pressed. Since the respondent-plaintiff also admits that the matter has been settled between the parties, it is ordered that no court fee need be required.
Sd/Sathish Ninan, Judge
rsr
V.B. Vinu Raj
The Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd.
Sathish Ninan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
