K.K.Yousuf v. Ramlath.K.P
Case brief
What is this about?
Rent Controller upheld eviction of tenant on ground of personal necessity. Court allowed withdrawal upon undertaking to vacate by 1.1.2025 and pay arrears.
What did the court decide?
Withdrawal of revision petition allowed subject to tenant vacating by 01.01.2025 and paying arrears.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE EASWARAN S.
WEDNESDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF JUNE 2024 / 5TH ASHADHA, 1946
RCREV. NO. 59 OF 2024
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 29.11.2023 IN RCA NO.12 OF 2022 OF
DISTRICTCOURT&SESIONS&MOTORACCIDENTCLAIMS
TRIBUNAL ,KALPETTA ARISING OUT OF THE ORDER DATED 31.10.2022 IN
RCP NO.3 OF 2021 OF MUNCIFF MAGISTRATE COURT,MANANTHAVADY
REVISION PETITIONER(S)/APPELLANT/RESPONDNET:
K.K.YOUSUF
AGED 66 YEARS
S/O. KHADER, KAYYALAKKAL HOUSE, VEGETABLE MERCHANT,
THRISSILERY AMSOM DESOM, KATTIKULAM.P.O, MANANTHAVADY
TALUK, WAYANAD DISTRICT., PIN – 670646
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the eviction order of the lower authorities was illegal, arbitrary or perverse warranting interference.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.K. YOUSUF
- respondent
RAMLATH.K.P
- respondent
SAREENA AZEEZ
- respondent
ABDUL HAKEEM
- respondent
RASHEEDA.E.K
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court