R.C.R.No.186 of 2020 respondent-landlord as loan on 29.01.2011, is totally misplaced and against the settled principles of law in this regard. Needless to say, the order declining eviction of the revision petitioner/tenant, has been rightly reversed by the Rent Control Appellate Authority, though the reasoning in the judgment in R.C.A No.72 of 2014 is mainly thrust on the absence of any convincing evidence to establish the payment of Rs.75,000/-, which the revision petitioner/tenant claimed to have paid to the respondent/landlord. The aspect whether the payment of Rs.75,000/- said to have been made by the revision petitioner-tenant to the respondent/landlord, was supported by convincing evidence or not, and whether the actual rate of rent, as per the rental agreement between the Revision petitioner and the respondent was Rs.3,294/- per month, as claimed by the respondent, or Rs.1,594/- per month, as claimed by the revision petitioner, need not be adjudicated in this revision proceedings, since being irrelevant in deciding the point involved.
