K.a.Chandran v. Cheriyakomath Rajeevan
Kerala HCOP (RC)/105/2019
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
High Court held that because the rent control petition was remanded to the Rent Control Court for fresh disposal, the execution proceedings no longer survived. Consequently, the writ petition challenging the stay of execution was closed as the issues involved no longer survived after the remand order.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
¶2
PRESENT
¶3
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN
¶4
&
¶5
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.GIRISH
¶6
THURSDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 12TH MAGHA, 1945
¶7
OP (RC) NO. 105 OF 2019
¶8
(E.A.No.181/2014 IN E.P.NO.132/2014 IN R.C.P.NO.2/2005)
¶9
PETITIONERS:
¶10
1 K.A.CHANDRAN AGED 43 YEARS S/O KAIPACHERY ANDI, VAYATHOOR AMSOM DESOM, ULICKAL P.O.IRITTY TALUK, KANNUR DISTRICT-670 705.
¶11
2 K.A SANTHA, AGED 40 YEARS D/O KAIPACHERY ANDI, VAYATHOOR AMSOM DESOM, ULICKAL P.O.IRITTY TALUK, KANNUR DISTRICT-670 705.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
AI extract
Whether the execution proceedings survived after the order remanding the rent control matter.
If there was any scope for further proceedings against the findings on stay of execution.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
K.A.Chandran
- petitioner
K.A Santha
- respondent
Cheriyakomath Rajeevan
- respondent
K.A Hema
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court