Mohandas, v. Ani S.
Case brief
What is this about?
Claimant challenged MACT Kollam orders dismissing restoration applications of his 2000 motor accident claim dismissed for default. On the insurer's concession, the High Court restored the claim, denying interest for the period from dismissal to restoration.
What did the court decide?
Impugned MACT orders set aside; O.P(MV) No.1694/2000 restored, without interest from 29.07.2004 till restoration.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
TUESDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 1ST PHALGUNA, 1945
OP (MAC) NO. 53 OF 2020
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT OPMV 1694/2000 OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL ,KOLLAM
PETITIONER/S:
MOHANDAS,
AGED 52 YEARS
S/O.MADHAVAN PILLAI, EDATHARA PUTHEN VEEDU,
KADAMPATTUKONAM CHERRY, PARIPPALLY VILLAGE, KOLLAM
DIST., PIN- 691 574.
BY ADV G.BHAGAVAT SINGH
RESPONDENT/S:
1ANI S.
S/O.SADASIVAN, CHARUVILA VEEDU, JAWAHAR JN., PARIPPALLY
P.O., KOLLAM - 691 574.
2 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD. DIVISIONAL OFFICE, KOLLAM - 691001.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the MACT orders refusing restoration of O.P(MV) No.1694/2000, dismissed for default, could be set aside and the claim restored subject to conditions.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mohandas
- respondent
Ani S.
- respondent
New India Assurance Co. Ltd.
- respondent
Ramadevi
- respondent
Gopakumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court