Vishnu.v v. Sindhu
Case brief
What is this about?
A father challenged the Family Court's grant of overnight interim custody of his 3½-year-old son to the maternal grandmother, whose child's mother had died. The High Court found the Family Court had considered all relevant facts and declined to interfere, dismissing the petition.
What the court decided
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFKERALAATERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THEHONOURABLEMR.JUSTICERAJAVIJAYARAGHAVANV
&
THEHONOURABLEMR.JUSTICEP.M.MANOJ
FRIDAY,THE12THDAYOFAPRIL2024/23RDCHAITHRA,1946
OP(FC)NO.262OF2024
AGAINSTTHEORDER/JUDGMENTDATED23.03.2024INOPGWNO.1468
OF2023OFFAMILYCOURT,KOLLAM
PETITIONER/S:
VISHNU.V,AGED33YEARS
S/O.AYYAPPANPILLAI,THEKKETHILVEEDU,THATTARKONAM,
T.K.M.CP.O,KOLLAMNOWRESIDINGATNEARWATER
AUTHORITY,RAMANKULANGARA,SANGEETHAJUNCTION,KAVANAD
P.O,KOLLAM-,PIN-691003
BYADVS.
K.SIJU
ANJANAKANNATH
MARIYAJOSE
JOSHNAJOY
RESPONDENT/S:
SINDHU,AGED58YEARS
D/O.RADHA,MANIKYAM,VETTILATHAZHAM,DECENT
JUNCTION.P.O,KOLLAM-,PIN-691577
THISOP(FAMILYCOURT)HAVINGCOMEUPFORADMISSION
ON12.04.2024,THECOURTONTHESAMEDAYDELIVEREDTHE
FOLLOWING:
2
OP(FC)No.262 of 2024
JUDGMENT
Raja Vijayaraghavan, J.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Family Court was justified in granting overnight interim custody of the minor child to his maternal grandmother.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Vishnu V
- respondent
Sindhu
Coram
Raja Vijayaraghavan V
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court