Disposed

Mubeena Latheef v. Mukhdar Ahammed

Kerala HC11 Apr 2024OP (FC)/186/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Kerala disposed of the original petition seeking expeditious consideration of the underlying custody case. It directed the Family Court to expedite proceedings and finalize the matter within an outer limit of four months based on the Court's report.

What did the court decide?

Directing the Family Court to expedite proceedings and finalise them within an outer limit of four months.

Mubeena Latheef Vs Mukhdar Ahammed — Child Custody and Guardianship | Kerala HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V

¶4

¶5

THEHONOURABLEMR.JUSTICEP.M.MANOJ
THURSDAY,THE11THDAYOFAPRIL2024/22NDCHAITHRA,1946
OP(FC)NO.186OF2024

¶6

AGAINSTTHEORDER/JUDGMENTDATEDINOPGWNO.1186OF2022OF
FAMILYCOURT,NEDUMANGAD

¶7

PETITIONER/S:

¶8

MUBEENALATHEEF,AGED29YEARS
D/OABDULLATHEEF,THOUFEEQMANZIL,PAZHAVILA,
PANGODEP.O.,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,PIN-695609

¶9

BY ADV LATHEESH SEBASTIAN

¶10

RESPONDENT/S:

¶11

MUKHDARAHAMMED,AGED41YEARS
CHERUCHITTUMKARAVEEDU,KANNAMPALLIBHAGOM,
KAYAMKULAMP.O.,ALAPPUZHA,PIN-690502

¶12

BYADVS.
P.A.ABDULJABBAR
MUHAMMEDSHAFFI(K/1201/2012)
EHLASHALEEMAC.K.(K/001446/2021)

¶13

SRI P A ABDUL JABBAR, FOR PARTY RESP.

¶14

THISOP(FAMILYCOURT)HAVINGCOMEUPFORADMISSION
ON11.04.2024,THECOURTONTHESAMEDAYDELIVEREDTHE
FOLLOWING:

¶15

¶16

OP(FC) No.186 of 2024

¶17

JUDGMENT

¶18

Raja Vijayaraghavan, J.

¶19

The petitioner herein is the 1st respondent in OP(G&W)No.1186 of 2022 on the files of the Family Court, Nedumangad. The aforesaid petition has been filed by the respondent seeking custody of his two elder children. According to the petitioner, she has four children in her marital union with the respondent. It is in the afore circumstances that this petition is filed seeking expeditious consideration of OP(G&W) No.1186 of 2022. She has also grievance that an application filed by her as IA No.8 of 2024 for early disposal of the matter has not been taken up for consideration by the Family Court.

¶20

A report has been called for by this Court directing the Family Court as regards the relative pendency and the prospects of expediting the proceedings.

¶21

In the report it is stated that IA No.8 of 2024 is posted on 19.04.2024 and the same can be disposed of on the same day itself. It is further stated that the entire proceedings can be concluded within an

¶22

¶23

OP(FC) No.186 of 2024

¶24

outer limit of four months.

¶25

In that view of the matter, this original petition is disposed of directing the Family Court to expedite the matter and make an endeavour to finalise the proceedings as stated in the report dated 08.04.2024 within an outer time limit of four months.

¶26

sd/-

¶27

RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V

JUDGE

sd/-

P.M.MANOJ

JUDGE

das

OP(FC) No.186 of 2024

¶35

APPENDIX OF OP (FC) 186/2024

¶36

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

¶37

ExhibitP1TRUECOPYOFTHEPETITIONINO.P.(G&W)
NO.1186/2022OFFAMILYCOURT,NEDUMANGAD,
WHICHWASORIGINALLYFILEDBEFOREFAMILY
COURT,MAVELIKKARAASO.P.NO.1128/2021
ExhibitP2TRUECOPYOFTHEOBJECTIONOFTHEPETITIONER
TOEXT.P1ORIGINALPETITION
ExhibitP3TRUECOPYOFTHEPETITIONINI.ANO8/2024IN
O.P(G&W)NO.1186/2022OFFAMILYCOURT,
NEDUMANGAD

Mubeena Latheef v. Mukhdar Ahammed

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mubeena Latheef v. Mukhdar Ahammed

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jeena P.A Vs Ashik P.A

Ravi Vs Santhakumary

Sajeena .a Vs State of Kerala

Jissimol Abraham @ Elizabeth Vs Babu Joseph @ Joseph

Thomas @ Manoj E.J. Vs Indu S

Alex V.C. Vs Saramma Simon