Commission recommendations, the scale of pay for the post was revised to Rs.5500-9000; and the pension of the petitioner was revised proportionate to the pay revision brought into force and he continued to receive it at that rate till 30.09.2008, the date on which, pension was revised proportionate to the next revision of pension as per VIth Central Pay Commission recommendation. As per Annex.A6 communication dated 28.07.2000, the third respondent revised the pension of the petitioner as Rs.2,750/-, i.e., 50% of Rs.5,500/-. According to the petitioner, the revised pension on implementation of the VIth Central Pay Commission recommendations is to be calculated as 50% of the sum of minimum pay of the pre-revised pay scale multiplied by the multiplicand of 1.86 added to the grade pay of Rs.4,200/-. Thus, the petitioner ought to have received more than what was paid to him. Though the petitioner filed several representations, the same were not considered by the respondents. Aggrieved by the same, the original application was filed before the tribunal; and the tribunal, after elaborate consideration of the issue, dismissed the original application, holding that the petitioner is not entitled to get any further amount than what was paid to him since the revision of
