Rajan v. Chenthamara
Case brief
What is this about?
Petition seeking expeditious disposal of pending appeal; court directs due preference in accordance with High Court Office Memorandum for senior citizens. No substantive ruling.
What did the court decide?
Due preference per senior citizen Office Memorandum in disposing A.S. No.1/2020.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. JAYACHANDRAN
THURSDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF JANUARY 2024 / 21ST POUSHA, 1945
OP(C) NO. 71 OF 2024
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT AS 1/2020 OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT
& SESSIONS COURT - V, PALAKKAD / IV ADDITIONAL MACT, PALAKKAD PETITIONER/APPELLANT/DEFENDANT:
RAJAN AGED 64 YEARS S/O.VELU, KANNIYODE HOUSE, VILAYANNUR PO, ALATHUR, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN - 678731 BY ADVS. K.MOHANAKANNAN D.S.THUSHARA
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF:
CHENTHAMARA
AGED 62 YEARS S/O.VELU, KANNIYODE HOUSE, VILAYANNUR PO, ALATHUR, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN - 678731
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's appeal A.S. No.1/2020 should be disposed of expeditiously, with priority as a senior citizen.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Rajan
- respondent
Chenthamara
Coram
C. Jayachandran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court