Disposed

Suhara v. Shemeem

Kerala HC9 Jan 2024OP(C)/2827/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

First defendant in a partition-related suit sought early disposal on grounds of senior citizenship and kidney disease. The High Court found the Sub Judge's progress report unsatisfactory and directed expeditious completion of trial within eight months.

What the court decided

AI extract

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. JAYACHANDRAN

¶4

TUESDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF JANUARY 2024 / 19TH POUSHA, 1945

¶5

OP(C) NO. 2827 OF 2023

¶6

OS 39/2019 OF SUB COURT, IRINJALAKUDA

¶7

PETITIONER/1ST DEFENDANT:

¶8

1SUHARA
AGED 61 YEARS
S/O. THARUPEEDIKAYIL UMMAR KONATHUKUNNU POST,
KARUPPADANNA DESOM, THEKKUMKKARA VILLAGE,
MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, THRISSUR, PIN - 680123
BY ADVS.
K.B.GANGESH
SMITHA CHATHANARAMBATH
ATHIRA A.MENON
HARISANKAR.K.V.

¶9

RESPONDENTS / PLAINTIFFS & DEFENDANTS 2 TO 6:

¶10

`1`	`SHEMEEM`
	`AGED 39 YEARS`
	`D/O. THARUPEEDIKAYIL` `MUHAMMAD ASIF, AZHIK`	`UMMER AND W/O. KAITHAKKAPARAMBIL` `ODE POST, AZHIKODE DESOM,`
	`AZHIKODE VILLAGE, KO` `THRISSUR, PIN - 6806`	`DUNGALLUR TALUK,` `66`
`2`	`SULFIKKAR ALI` `AGED 35 YEARS`
	`S/O. THARUPEEDIKAYIL` `KARUPPADANNA DESOM,` `MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK,`	`UMMAR KONATHUKUNNU POST,` `THEKKUMKKARA VILLAGE,` `THRISSUR, PIN - 680123`
`3`	`MUHAMMED`
	`AGED 28 YEARS`
	`S/O. THARUPEEDIKAYIL` `KARUPPADANNA DESOM,` `MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK,`	`UMMAR KONATHUKUNNU POST,` `THEKKUMKKARA VILLAGE,` `THRISSUR, PIN - 680123`
`4`	`YASIN`
	`AGED 24 YEARS`
	`S/O. THARUPEEDIKAYIL` `KARUPPADANNA DESOM,` `MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK,`	`UMMAR KONATHUKUNNU POST,` `THEKKUMKKARA VILLAGE,` `THRISSUR, PIN - 680123`
`5`	`AABID` `AGED 21 YEARS`
	`S/O. THARUPEEDIKAYIL` `KARUPPADANNA DESOM,`	`UMMAR KONATHUKUNNU POST,` `THEKKUMKKARA VILLAGE,`
	`MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK,`	`THRISSUR, PIN - 680123`

Suhara Vs Shemeem — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Kerala HC (2024)

¶36

		`APPENDIX OF OP(C) 2827/2023`
`PETITION`	`ER’S EXHIBITS:`
`EXHIBIT`	`P1`	`TRUE COPY OF THE PLAINT IN OS NO. 39/2019 ON` `THE FILE OF SUB COURT, IRINJALAKKUDA FILED BY` `THE 1 ST RESPONDENT`
`EXHIBIT`	`P2`	`TRUE COPY OF IA NO. 2468/2019 FILED IN IN OS` `NO. 39/2019 ON THE FILE OF SUB COURT,` `IRINJALAKKUDA`
`EXHIBIT`	`P3`	`TRUE COPY OF WRITTEN STATEMENT FILED BY` `DEFENDANTS 1 AND 3 TO 6 IN OS NO. 39/2019 ON` `THE FILE OF SUB COURT, IRINJALAKKUDA`
`EXHIBIT`	`P4`	`TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BY DEFENDANTS` `1 AND 3 TO 6 TO EXT P2`
`EXHIBIT`	`P5`	`TRUE COPY OF ORDER PASSED BY SUB COURT,` `IRINJALAKKUDA IN IA NO. 2468/2019 IN OS NO.` `39/2019 ON THE FILE OF SUB COURT, IRINJALAKKUDA` `ON 16.09.2023`
`EXHIBIT`	`P6`	`TRUE COPY OF MEDICAL CERTIFICATE ISSUED TO THE` `PETITIONER ON 19.10.2023`

Suhara v. Shemeem

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Case details

Similar cases

Subhash Vs Bhavani

Letchmi Vs K.D.H.P Company Private Ltd.

Rev. Ajin Kamal.K.S Vs South Kerala Diocese (Skd)

Karthikeyan Vs Udayadevi

Kunjamma Vs M/S. Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Ltd.

Suhara v. Shemeem

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Case details

Similar cases

Subhash Vs Bhavani

Letchmi Vs K.D.H.P Company Private Ltd.

Rev. Ajin Kamal.K.S Vs South Kerala Diocese (Skd)

Karthikeyan Vs Udayadevi

Kunjamma Vs M/S. Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Ltd.

A compact analysis

Coram

Shihabudeen Vs Jaffar