Joy, v. Wilson
Case brief
What is this about?
A civil revision petition regarding execution of a decree was dismissed because the matter was not pressed by the petitioners.
What did the court decide?
The OP(C) is dismissed as not pressed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH
TUESDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 6TH CHAITHRA, 1946
OP(C) NO. 128 OF 2024
AGAINST THE ORDER IN E.P.NO.6/2022 IN OS NO.251 OF 2019 OF MUNSIFF COURT, ADIMALI
PETITIONERS/JUDGMENT DEBTORS:
1 JOY, AGED 58 YEARS
S/O. JOSEPH,KUZHIPPILLIL HOUSE, ADIMALY KARA, ADIMALY P.O., MANNAMKANDAM VILLAGE, DEVIKULAMTALUK., PIN - 685561
2 ANI, AGED 29 YEARS D/O. JOY,KUZHIPPILLIL HOUSE, W/O. JIMMY, NJALIYAN HOUSE, KOTAMAMKARA, NILEESWARAM P.O., KALADI VILLAGE, PERUMBAVOORTALUK, PIN - 683542
BY ADVS. GEORGE SEBASTIAN JOHNSON K.KURIEN
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Joy
- petitioner
Ani
- respondent
Wilson
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court