Vinod v. Sabu Paily
Case brief
What is this about?
Motor accident claims appeal by an electrician-cum-plumber injured in a 2006 collision seeking enhancement of Tribunal-awarded compensation. The court revised monthly income upward, applied 40% prospective addition for disability, and enhanced amounts under several heads.
What did the court decide?
Additional compensation of Rs.5,49,060/- with interest as ordered by Tribunal and proportionate costs, to be deposited by insurer within three months.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.
THURSDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 12TH MAGHA, 1945
MACA NO. 284 OF 2012
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT OPMV 1700/2006 OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS
TRIBUNAL, PERUMBAVOOR
APPELLANT/PETITIONER:
VINOD
S/O.PANKAJAKSHAN, MANGALATH HOUSE,
OORAKKAD, KIZHAKKAMBALAM VILLAGE.
BY ADVS.
SRI.T.K.KOSHY
SMT.V.V. RISANI
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENT NOS. 1 & 2:
1 SABU PAILY S/O.PAILY, KUREEKKAVEEPPATTU HOUSE, PAZHANGANAD, KIZHAKKAMBALAM P.O.-683 562.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the compensation awarded by the Tribunal required enhancement.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
VINOD
- respondent
SABU PAILY
- respondent
NATIONAL INSURANCE CO.LTD.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court