him were examined and asserted the accident. As mentioned above, the fact that all the damages were sustained to the car on its left side also makes, the cause of the accident as recorded in Ext.A2 wound certificate, i.e, colliding with a post, more probable. If the vehicle coming from the opposite direction is hitting the said vehicle, the damages on the left side alone are highly unlikely. Of course, it is possible in certain circumstances where the vehicle coming from the opposite direction, was completely on its wrong side, it could be possible, but none of the statements of the witnesses indicate any such thing. Therefore, when all the aforesaid aspects are taken into consideration, the view adopted by the Tribunal is a probable one. Of course, as rightly pointed out by the learned counsel for the appellant, in Pazhaniammal, (supra) this Court categorically observed that, when no contra evidence was adduced, the conclusions arrived at by the police after investigation, could be accepted as the prima facie proof of the evidence. However, in paragraph 8 of the Pazhaniammal (supra), it is observed as follows:
