Sarojiniamma v. the Divisional Manager
Case brief
What is this about?
In an appeal against a MACT award, the High Court disposed of the matter by modifying the award to enforce a joint settlement memo, directing the insurer to deposit an additional amount with interest.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
MACA.No.2320/18
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.
WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 18TH MAGHA, 1945
MACA NO. 2320 OF 2018
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT OPMV 1112/2016 OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL ,KOTTAYAM
APPELLANT/PETITIONER:
SAROJINIAMMA,
AGED 65 YEARS, W/O.GOPINATHAN NAIR, KUNNATHETTU HOUSE, PAREVALAVU BHAGOM, KONGANDOOR, AYARKUNNAM VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM.
BY ADVS. SRI.P.M.JOSHI SMT.SIJI K.PAUL
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Motor Accidents Claims Appeal should be disposed of based on a joint settlement memo between the parties.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
SAROJINIAMMA
- respondent
THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD.
Coram
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court