Dismissed

Anzar E. v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC28 May 2024Crl.MC/3560/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam considered a Criminal Miscellaneous Case filed under Section 482 CrPC to quash proceedings. As no representation was filed by the petitioner's counsel who was not intended to proceed, the court dismissed the petition for default and vacated the interim stay on issuing a warrant.

What did the court decide?

The petition was dismissed for default; interim stay on issuing a warrant was vacated.

Anzar E. Vs State of Kerala — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Kerala HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN

¶4

TUESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF MAY 2024 / 7TH JYAISHTA, 1946

¶5

CRL.MC NO. 3560 OF 2020

¶6

CRIME NO.975/2014 OF CENTRAL POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM

¶7

PETITIONER/1ST ACCUSED:

¶8

ANZAR E.
AGED 41 YEARS
S/O.LATE IBRAHIM KUTTY, NEDUMTHODATH MEKKATHIL HOUSE,
MUKUNDAPURAM P.O., CHAVARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT.

¶9

BY ADVS.
V.PHILIP MATHEW
SRI.JOHNSON K.KURIEN
SRI.GIBI.C.GEORGE
SRI.JEPH JOSEPH

¶10

RESPONDENTS/STATE & THE DEFACTO COMPLAINANT:

¶11

1STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,
ERNAKULAM - 682 031.

¶12

2HASEENA

¶13

AGED 32, D/O.IBRAHIM KUTTY, PUTHENPURAYAKKAL HOUSE,
NEAR IDAKKULANGARA SREE BUDHA SCHOOL, IDAKKULANGARA P.O.,
THODIYUR VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT - 690 523.
BY ADV SUBHASH SYRIAC
SR PP - RENJIT GEORGE

¶14

THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
28.05.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶15

Crl.M.C. No. 3560 of 2020

¶16

¶17

ORDER

¶18

Dated this the 28 th day of May, 2024

¶19

This Criminal Miscellaneous Case has been filed

¶20

under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, to quash all further proceedings pursuant to Annexure-I FIR No.975/2014 of Central Police Station, Ernakulam, where the prosecution alleges commission of offecnes punishable under Sections 417, 468, 471 read with 34 of IPC by the accused .

¶21

No representation for the petitioner.

¶22

Since the learned counsel for the petitioner is not

¶23

intended to proceed with the matter, this petition stands dismissed for default.

¶24

Interim stay in the matter of issuing warrant against the petitioner stands vacated. Registry is directed to forward a copy of this order to the trial court, for information and further steps.

Sd/-

A. BADHARUDEEN

JUDGE

Anzar E. v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anzar E. v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

T.P.Sadikh Vs Hasna

Meghana Vs State of Kerala

Sujith Sasidharan Vs State of Kerala

Xxx Vs State of Kerala

Shahid Vs State of Kerala

Visesh N R Vs State of Kerala