Dismissed
K.J.Xavier v. E.v.Thomas
Kerala HCCRL.A/448/2006
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala disposed of a criminal appeal under Section 378 CrPC by dismissing it as abated, noting that the first respondent/accused had expired.
What did the court decide?
Criminal appeal dismissed as abated on account of the death of the first respondent/accused.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
¶2
PRESENT
¶3
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.G. AJITHKUMAR
¶4
FRIDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF JANUARY 2024 / 22ND POUSHA, 1945
¶5
CRL.A NO. 448 OF 2006
¶6
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 06.10.2005 IN CC 1573/2000 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF
¶7
FIRST CLASS-I, ERNAKULAM
¶8
APPELLANT:
¶9
K.J.XAVIER, KANIYAKKODATHU HOUSE,
SANKARANANDASHRAMAM ROAD, AYYAPPANKAVU ROAD,,
KOCHI 682 018.
¶10
BY ADV SRI.ALEXANDER PETER
¶11
RESPONDENTS:
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
AI extract
Whether the criminal appeal stands abated due to the death of the first respondent/accused during the pendency of the appeal.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
K.J. Xavier
- respondent
E.V. Thomas
Coram
AI extract
P.G. Ajithkumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court