The petitioner, who was a respondent in the underlying First Appeal, filed a contempt petition alleging non-compliance orders regarding specific plaint schedule items. The Court found no case made out for contempt and closed the petition.
The contempt case was closed as no case of contempt was made out.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN
FRIDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 20TH MAGHA, 1945
CON.CASE(C) NO. 386 OF 2024
FAO 151/2023 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/1ST RESPONDENT IN THE FAO:
SUHANA SHAMSUDHEEN AGED 52 YEARS D/O LATE B.A. SHAMSUDHEEN, SALAMATH HOUSE, ARAMANAPADY, VAZHA[PALLY EAST VILLAGE, CHANGANASSERY, P.O., KOTTAYAM, PIN - 686101 BY ADV K.C.VINCENT
RESPONDENT/2ND AND 3RD RESPONDENTS IN THE FAO:
1 JAYASHREE T.T AGED 50 YEARS NAME OF FATHER NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE MANAGER, THE MEENACHIL EAST URBAN CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD, MUNDAKAYAM BRANCH, PISHARAKUNNEL HOUSE, THIDANADU P.O., KOTTAYAM, PIN - 686123 2 NIRMALA GEORGE AGED 53 YEARS NAME OF FATHER NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE MANAGER, THE MEENACHIL EAST URBAN CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD, KANJIRAPALLY BRANCH, THUNDIYIL HOUSE, KANJIRAPALLY P.O., KOTTAYAM, PIN - 686507
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09.02.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Con.Case(C).No.386 of 2024
Sathish Ninan, J.
==============================
Cont.Case (C).No.386 of 2024 ========================== Dated this the 9th day of February, 2024
JUDGMENT
The F.A.O was filed against the order in an
interlocutory application relating to plaint schedule
Item Nos.8 to 12. The order was modified by this Court to a limited extent. The direction in the judgment has
been complied with.
Now the grievance of the petitioner is with regard to other items included in the plaint schedule. No case of contempt is made out.
The contempt case is accordingly closed.
Sathish Ninan, Judge
rsr
Con.Case(C).No.386 of 2024
-: 3 :-
APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 386/2024
PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure A1 A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN F.A.O. NO. 151 OF 2023 DATED 18.12.2023 Annexure A2 A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 15.01.2024 SENT BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER Annexure A3 A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 15.01.2024 SENT BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER Annexure A4 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 15.11.2023 IN I.A. NO. 1 OF 2023 IN O.S. NO. 35 OF 2023 ON THE FILES OF THE HON'BLE SUB COURT, PALA
Suhana Shamsudheen Aged 52 Years
Jayashree T.T Aged 50 Years, The Manager, The Meenachil East Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd, Mundakayam Branch
Nirmala George Aged 53 Years, The Manager, The Meenachil East Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd, Kanjirapally Branch
Sathish Ninan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
