Disposed

Mini U v. Giridhar Aramane I.A.S.

Kerala HC12 Apr 2024Con.Case(C)/2523/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Civil contempt case filed for alleged non-compliance with directions in a 2019 writ petition concerning Border Roads Organisation dues. Counsel on both sides submitted that the writ judgment directions stand complied with; recording this submission, the court closed the contempt case.

What did the court decide?

Contempt case closed upon recorded submission that prior writ judgment directions were complied with.

Mini U Vs Giridhar Aramane I.A.S. — Contempt of Court | Kerala HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH

¶4

FRIDAY, THE 12^TH DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 23RD CHAITHRA, 1946 CON.CASE(C) NO. 2523 OF 2023 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN WP(C) NO.4501 OF 2019 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONER:

¶5

MINI U., AGED 43 YEARS, W/O.LATE HAJI KUMAR GANDHIPURAM HOUSE, MUTHUKULAM SOUTH P.O., DISTRICT ALAPPUZHA, KERALA, PIN – 690506

¶6

BY ADVS. R.PRADEEP KUMAR U.BALAGANGADHARAN

¶7

RESPONDENTS:

¶8

1 GIRIDHAR ARAMANE, I.A.S., AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF DEFENCE (BORDER ROADS) GOVT OF INDIA, SOUTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI, PIN - 110001 2 LT. GEN REGHU SRINIVASAN, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF BORDER ROADS SEEMA SADAK BHAWAN, RING ROAD NARAINA, DELHI CANTT., NEW DELHI, PIN - 110010 3 COL VISHAL GULERIA, OFFG CE AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE CHIEF ENGINEER HQ CE (P) DEEPAK C/O 56 APO, PIN - 931709

¶9

Cont.Case(C) No.2523/2023

¶10

: 2 :

¶11

4 R K PRAKASH, EE (CIV) AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE OFFICER COMMANDING 108 RCC (GREF) C/O 56 APO, PIN – 930108

¶12

BY ADV. JAGADEESH LAKSHMAN

¶13

THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12.04.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶14

Cont.Case(C) No.2523/2023

¶15

: 3 :

¶16

JUDGMENT

¶17

Dated this the 12^th day of April , 2024

¶18

Counsel on either side submit that the directions

¶19

contained in the judgment dated 04.07.2023 in W.P.(C) No.4501 of 2019 stand complied with.

¶20

Recording the said submission, the Contempt of Court Case is closed.

Sd/-

N. NAGARESH

JUDGE

Cont.Case(C) No.2523/2023

¶26

: 4 :

¶27

APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 2523/2023

¶28

PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:

¶29

Annexure A 1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.[C]NO. 4501/2019 DATED 04.07.2023 Annexure A 2 A TRUE COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 4TH RESPONDENT DATED 5TH AUGUST 2023

¶30

RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES:

¶31

Annexure R1(a) The true copy of the bank e-payment receipt dated 01-04-2024.

Mini U v. Giridhar Aramane I.A.S.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mini U v. Giridhar Aramane I.A.S.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Premakumari a Vs the Authorised Officer

Authorised Officer Vs M/S Pinnacle Impex

Reshma P.R Vs the Passport Officer

Bindu Santosh, Vs Thodupuzha Urban Co-Operative Bank

Shali K J, Vs the Branch Manager

Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Limited Vs the Sub Registrar