A civil contempt case arising from an earlier writ judgment was not pressed by the petitioner's counsel; the court recorded the submission and dismissed the contempt case as not pressed, deciding nothing further.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
TUESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 24TH MAGHA, 1945
CON.CASE(C) NO. 18 OF 2024
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 32182/2023 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
RENCY GEORGE
AGED 43 YEARS
W/O. THOMAS P.M., PUTHENPURACKAL, PATTANIPARA, AVIDUKKA
PO, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN - 673528
BY ADV JEFRIN JOSE
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT NO.1:
MOHAMMED ALI
(FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), THE
MANAGER, KERALA STATE FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES, THIRUVAMBADI
BRANCH, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN - 673603
BY ADV P.PRIJITH
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 13.02.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
CON.CASE(C) NO. 18 OF 2024
2
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the petitioner
submits that this contempt case is not pressed.
Recording the submission, the contempt case
is dismissed as not pressed.
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE
SAS
CON.CASE(C) NO. 18 OF 2024
3
APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 18/2024
PETITIONER’S ANNEXURES:
Annexure 1CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 2/11/2023
IN WP(C) NO. 32182/2023 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE
COURT
Annexure 2A TRUE COPY OF THE EMAIL DATED 12/5/2023 SENT
BY THE PETITIONER TO THE RESPONDENT
Annexure 3A TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE DATED 24/2/2015
ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENT MENTAL HEALTH CENTRE,
KOZHIKODE CERTIFYING THE DISABILITY OF THE
MOTHER IN LAW OF THE PETITIONER
RENCY GEORGE
MOHAMMED ALI
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court