Allowed

Fazil v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC10 May 2024Bail Appl./3750/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Accused Nos. 1 and 2 in an FIR alleging obstruction and assault on a KSRTC bus driver sought pre-arrest bail. The Public Prosecutor raised no serious objection. The court found custodial interrogation unnecessary and granted anticipatory bail subject to surrender, bond, and appearance conditions.

What did the court decide?

Pre-arrest bail granted with conditions: surrender within two weeks, Rs.50,000 bond each with two sureties, weekly Saturday appearances until final report, no witness tampering.

Fazil Vs State of Kerala — Anticipatory Bail | Kerala HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JOHNSON JOHN

¶4

FRIDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF MAY 2024 / 20TH VAISAKHA, 1946

¶5

BAIL APPL. NO. 3750 OF 2024

¶6

CRIME NO.369/2024 OF FEROKE POLICE STATION, KOZHIKODE

¶7

AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED 27.04.2024 IN CRMC NO.678 OF 2024
OF DISTRICT COURT & SESSIONS COURT,KOZHIKODE
PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.1 AND 2:

¶8

1FAZIL
AGED 30 YEARS
S/O. MUHAMMED, MOOLATH HOUSE,
R.A ROAD,THIRUVALI, PATHIRIYAL,
MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN – 676123

¶9

2ARJUN RAVI
AGED 34 YEARS
S/O. RAVEENDRAN, SREESYLAM,
ITHILPARAMBA, DOWN HILL P.O,
MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN – 676519

¶10

BY ADV K.ABOOBACKER SIDHEEQUE

¶11

RESPONDENT/STATE:

¶12

STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA,
ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN – 682031

¶13

SRI. SANAL P RAJ - PP

¶14

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
10.05.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶15

BAIL APPL. NO. 3750 OF 2024

¶16

¶17

ORDER

¶18

This is an application seeking pre-arrest bail filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

¶19

The petitioners are accused Nos. 1 and 2 in Crime No. 369 of 2024 of Feroke Police Station, registered alleging offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 353, 294(b) read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860.

¶20

The prosecution case is that the de facto complainant was the driver of KSRTC bus bearing Registration No. KL-15-7794 and on 12.04.2024 at 1.10 p.m when the bus reached at Ramanattukara, the accused who were the driver and conductor of private bus bearing Registration No. KL-10-BD-3526 stopped the said private bus in front of the KSRTC bus and thereafter, uttered obscene words against the de facto complainant and the accused persons slapped the de facto complainant on his face and thereby obstructed him from discharging his duties as a public servant, and thereby committed the offences as aforesaid.

¶21

¶22

BAIL APPL. NO. 3750 OF 2024

¶23

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor.

¶24

The learned counsel for the petitioners pointed out that the petitioners are totally innocent and that it was the driver of the KSRTC bus, who drove the bus in a dangerous manner and attempted to hit on the private bus. It is stated that the petitioners never had any intention to restrain the de facto complainant from discharging his public duty. It is also stated that there is no necessity for any custodial interrogation in this case and that the petitioners are ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court.

¶25

The learned Public Prosecutor has no serious objection in granting pre-arrest bail to the petitioners, subject to stringent conditions.

¶26

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I find that there is no necessity for any custodial interrogation and therefore, pre-arrest bail can be granted to the petitioners subject to conditions.

¶27

In the result, this application is allowed on the

¶28

BAIL APPL. NO. 3750 OF 2024

¶29

¶30

following conditions:-

¶31

(i) The petitioners shall surrender before the Investigating Officer within a period of two weeks from

¶32

today, for subjecting themselves for interrogation.

¶33

(ii) After interrogation, the petitioners shall be released on bail on the very same day on executing a bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) each with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the Investigation Officer.

¶34

(iii) The petitioners shall appear before the investigating officer in Crime No. 369 of 2024 of Feroke Police Station, on every Saturday at 11.00 a.m. till the final report is filed.

¶35

(iv) The petitioners shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when required.

¶36

(v) The petitioners shall not attempt to influence the defacto complainant or interfere with the investigation or to influence or intimidate any witness in Crime No. 369 of 2024 of Feroke Police Station;

¶37

BAIL APPL. NO. 3750 OF 2024

¶38

¶39

(vi) The petitioners shall not involve in any other

¶40

crime while on bail.

¶41

If any of the above conditions are violated, the Investigating Officer in Crime No. 369 of 2024 of Feroke Police Station can file application before the jurisdictional Court, for cancellation of bail.

¶42

Sd/-

¶43

JOHNSON JOHN JUDGE

¶44

¶45

BAIL APPL. NO. 3750 OF 2024

¶46

¶47

APPENDIX OF BAIL APPL. 3750/2024

¶48

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

¶49

Annexure-A1A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED
27.04.2024 IN CRL.M.C NO. 678 OF 2024
OF THE COURT OF SESSION, KOZHIKODE
DIVISION.

Fazil v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Fazil v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jayalal.D Vs the Authorized Officer/Chief Manager

Prasad Vs the State of Kerala

Jolly S J Vs Tahasildar

Greeshma K.J., Vs State of Kerala

Sirajudheen.O.K Vs State of Kerala

V.P. Joseph Vs State of Kerala