Muhammad Rasool v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application in an excise offence case was dismissed as withdrawn at the petitioner's request, with the court recording counsel's submission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS
MONDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF MAY 2024 / 30TH VAISAKHA, 1946
BAIL APPL. NO. 3247 OF 2024
CRIME NO.111/2023 OF Palakkad Excise Range Office, Palakkad
PETITIONER/ACCUSED:
MUHAMMAD RASOOL, AGED 30 YEARS
SON OF JAFAR ALI, FLAT NO. CA/2C,
SURYA CENTRAL APARTMENTS,
G.B ROAD, PALAKKAD., PIN - 678001
BY ADV NIREESH MATHEW
RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:
STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA,
ERNAKULAM, KOCHI., PIN - 682031
OTHER PRESENT:
sr pp smt neema t v
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
20.05.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
B.A.3247/2024
-: 2 :-
C. S. DIAS, J.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = B. A. No. 3247 of 2024
ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits
that the bail application may be dismissed as withdrawn.
Accordingly, the bail application is dismissed as
withdrawn.
Sd/-
C. S. DIAS, JUDGE
Sbna/
Muhammad Rasool
State of Kerala
C.S.Dias
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court