Allowed

Kuttappan, v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC14 May 2024Bail Appl./2642/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Kerala, in a bail application filed for an offence under the Abkari Act, acknowledged the petitioner's innocence claim and granted bail due to unnecessary continued custody, subject to standard conditions including execution of a bond and reporting to the Investigating Officer.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner is released on bail subject to executing a bond for Rs. 50,000 with two solvent sureties and complying with reporting and non-interference conditions.

Kuttappan, Vs State of Kerala — Corruption | Kerala HC (2024)

¶1

B.A.2642/24

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.

¶5

TUESDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF MAY 2024 / 24TH VAISAKHA, 1946

¶6

BAIL APPL. NO. 2642 OF 2024

¶7

CRIME NO.107/2019 OF Sasthamcottah Excise Range Office, Kollam
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED 22.03.2024 IN SC NO.490 OF 2020
OF ASSISTANT SESSIONS COURT/SUB COURT/COMMERCIAL COURT,
KARUNAGAPPALLY
PETITIONER/S:

¶8

KUTTAPPAN,

¶9

AGED 69 YEARS

¶10

S/O CHATHAN,MANIKANDA BHAVANAM, PADINJATTAM KIZHAKKE
MURI, SOORANADU SOUTH VILLAGE, KUNNATHUR TALUK, KOLLAM
DISTRICT, PIN - 690522

¶11

BY ADVS.

¶12

K.V.ANIL KUMAR
SWAPNA VIJAYAN
RADHIKA S.ANIL

¶13

RESPONDENT/S:

¶14

STATE OF KERALA,

¶15

REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA,
PIN – 682031

¶16

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. RANJITH GEORGE

¶17

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14.05.2024,
THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶18

B.A.2642/24

¶19

¶20

MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J

¶21

...........................................................

¶22

B.A. No.2642 of 2024

¶23

Dated this the 14th day of May, 2024

¶24

O R D E R

¶25

This application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking regular bail.

¶26

2. The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.107/2019 of Sasthamcotta Excise

¶27

Range Office, Kollam District, for having allegedly committed offences punishable under Section 55(i) of the Abkari Act.

¶28

3. The prosecution allegation is that on 20.8.2019 at 6.30 am, the accused was found engaged in the illicit retail sale of Indian Made Foreign Liquor and thereby committed the offence. The accused was arrested on the same day, enlarged on bail, and the investigation was later completed. Upon filing the final report before the Judicial First Class Magistrate’s Court, Sasthamcotta, the case was taken on file as CP 57/2019 and committed to Sessions Court and later made over to the Assistant Sessions Court, Karunagappally as SC 490/2020. Though summons were issued for appearance, he remained absent. Accordingly, coercive steps were taken and notice was issued to the sureties who did not turn up and MC 11/2023 was registered against them. Thereafter, NBW was issued with a returnable date as 02.03.2024 and

¶29

B.A.2642/24

¶30

¶31

on that date the accused was arrested and produced, and he was remanded to judicial custody since then.

¶32

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would say that the petitioner is totally innocent and has been falsely implicated with ulterior motives. At any rate, he points out that the petitioner has been in custody since 02.03.2024 , and continued custody of the petitioner is unnecessary.

¶33

The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the petition and points out that the petitioner is not entitled to bail.

¶34

After having considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor and considering the allegation against the petitioner, the quantity involved, and the fact that he has been in custody since 02.03.2024, I hold that bail can be granted to the petitioner.

¶35

Accordingly, this application is allowed, and the petitioner is granted bail subject to the following conditions:-

¶36

(i) The petitioner shall be released on bail on executing a bond for Rs.50,000/(Rupees fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional court;

¶37

(ii) The petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer as and when directed;

¶38

(iii) The petitioner shall not tamper or attempt to tamper with the evidence or influence or try to influence the witnesses;

¶39

B.A.2642/24

¶40

¶41

(iv) The petitioner shall not be involved in any other crime while on bail;

¶42

If any of the conditions are violated, the court concerned will be empowered to take

¶43

steps for cancellation of bail as per law.

¶44

Sd/-

¶45

MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.

JUDGE

okb/

B.A.2642/24

APPENDIX OF BAIL APPL. 2642/2024

¶51

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

¶52

Annexure-AA COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 22.03.2024 IN
CRL.M.P. NO. 161 / 2024 OF THE ASSISTANT
SESSIONS COURT, KARUNAGAPPALLY

Kuttappan, v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kuttappan, v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jamal Mehaboob Cv Vs State of Kerala

Sinaj Michael Vs the Committee Constituted Under Rule 58 of Chapter IX of Kerala Panchayat Building RULES,2019

Zacharias Poomkudy Vs State of Kerala

Vishnu Udhayan, Vs State of Kerala

Swajith Vs State of Kerala

Kuttappan, Vs State of Kerala