Bail application withdrawn by petitioner's counsel before adjudication; court recorded the withdrawal and dismissed the application as withdrawn, preserving the petitioner's right to seek remedies in accordance with law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS
TUESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 15TH PHALGUNA, 1945
BAIL APPL. NO. 261 OF 2024
PETITIONER/ACCUSED:
SUVARNAN, AGED 46 YEARS S/O SUNDHARAN, EATTATH HOUSE, BLOCK OFFICE ROAD, PORATHISSERY P.O, IRINJALAKUDA NORTH, THRISSUR, PIN - 680125
BY ADV VINAY RAMDAS
RESPONDENTS/STATE:
STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031
OTHER PRESENT:
PP SMT SHYNIMOLE V O
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05.03.2024, THE
COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
BAIL APPL. NO.261 OF 2024
2
O R D E R
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, after arguing for sometime, seeks leave to withdraw the bail application, without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to workout his remedies in accordance with law. The said submission is recorded.
Resultantly, the bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-
C.S.DIAS
JUDGE
shg
Suvarnan
State of Kerala
C.S.Dias
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
