Ananthan Pillai v. S.N.v.Bhajana Samajam
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal suit from a Sub Court decree; no representation for the appellants and no steps taken, so the appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN
MONDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 21ST PHALGUNA, 1945
AS NO. 401 OF 1997
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 18.01.1996 IN OS NO.98 OF 1994 OF THE SUB COURT, CHERTHALA
APPELLANTS / DEFENDANTS:
BY ADVS SRI.ANEESH K.M
SRI.BIJU VARGHESE ABRAHAM
SRI.DILEEP CHANDRAN
RESPONDENTS / PLAINTIFFS:
BY ADV SRI.THOMAS JOSEPH
SRI.V.M.SALIM
THIS APPEAL SUITS HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11.03.2024,
THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
A.S.No.401 of 1997
-: 2 :-
Sathish Ninan, J.
==============================
A.S.No.401 of 1997
==========================
Dated this the 11th day of March, 2024
JUDGMENT
No representation for the appellants.
No steps taken.
The Appeal Suits is dismissed for non-
prosecution.
Sathish Ninan, Judge
rsr
Ananthan Pillai S/o. Raman Pillai
Visalakshy Amma daughter of Gouri Amma
Ananthan Pillai, S/o. Ramchandra Kaimal
S.N.V.Bhajana Samajam Chelattubhagom Muri, Panavally Village, represented by its President Raman Manoharan
Suresh, S/o. Mukundan
Krishnan Kesavan
Sathish Ninan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court