Ranjit v. Sivan
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal suit against a 1999 Sub Court decree dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellant was unrepresented and had not taken steps. The order decides nothing of general application.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 23RD PHALGUNA,
1945
AS NO. 270 OF 1999
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 21.01.1999 IN OS NO.190 OF 1994 OF ADDITIONAL SUB COURT, NORTH PARAVUR
APPELLANT/3RD DEFENDANT:
RANJITH, “WHITE HOUSE”, PULLAMKULAM JUNCTION, PARAVOOTHARA MURI, DO. VILLAGE, ALUVA TALUK.
BY ADV SRI.K.PAUL KURIAKOSE
RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANTS 1 AND 4:
- 1 SIVAN PONNEDATH VEETTIL, KIZHAKKEPRAM MURI, KOTTUVALLY VILLAGE, PROPRIETOR, “CHANDRA STORES” ROOM NO.196, WARD NO.IX, PARAVUR TOWN.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Ranjith
- respondent
Sivan
- respondent
George Payyappilly
- respondent
Thressiakutty Payyappilly
- respondent
P.T. Joseph
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court