Subin Jose T., v. the Secretary
Case brief
What is this about?
The Hon'ble Court dismissed the writ petition is closed after the counsel submitted that the temporary permit sought had already been granted.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition is closed in the status quo after receiving the submission regarding the grant of temporary permit.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN THURSDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 12TH SRAVANA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 9769 OF 2023
PETITIONER/S:
SUBIN JOSE T., AGED 52 YEARS S/O.JOSE T.L., THEKKEKARA HOUSE, CHITTILAPPILLY, THRISSUR., PIN - 680551 BY ADV I.DINESH MENON
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICE, CIVIL STATION, AYYANTHOLE P.O., THRISSUR., PIN - 680003
2 THE MANAGING DIRECTOR KSRTC, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695023., PIN - 695023
BY ADVS.
SHRI.DEEPU THANKAN, SC, KSRTC SINI JOSE P.C.CHACKO(PARATHANAM)
BY G.P. SMT. PARVATHY K.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03.08.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Subin Jose T.
- respondent
The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority
- respondent
The Managing Director KSRTC
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court