Dismissed
Glaze , v. State Tax Officer
Kerala HCWP(C)/7720/2023
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitioner's counsel submitted the writ petition was infructuous. The High Court dismissed the petition as infructuous and vacated any interim order.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
¶2
PRESENT
¶3
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH
¶4
FRIDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2023 / 14TH ASWINA, 1945
¶5
WP(C) NO. 7720 OF 2023
¶6
PETITIONER:
¶7
GLAZE ,
AGED 33 YEARS,
DOOR NO.40/1662, KOLLAMPARAMBLE BUILDING,
CONVENT JUNCTION, MARKET ROAD, COCHIN,
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER AND AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY,
SRI. MUHASIN K., PIN – 682011.
BY ADV.
SRI. TOMSON T. EMMANUEL
¶8
RESPONDENTS:
¶9
1STATE TAX OFFICER,
(FORMERLY COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER),
GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, 3RD CIRCLE,
CLASS TOWER, ERNAKULAM, COCHIN, PIN – 682018.
¶10
2 JOINT COMMISSIONER (APPEALS), STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, STATE TAX COMPLEX, MATTANCHERRY, COCHIN, PIN – 682002.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
GLAZE
- respondent
STATE TAX OFFICER
- respondent
JOINT COMMISSIONER (APPEALS), STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT
- respondent
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX, STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT
- respondent
STATE BANK OF INDIA, BROADWAY BRANCH
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court